Media and entertainment evaluation patterns
Media and entertainment evaluation patterns — primitive ratio, span rules, GEPA labeling, cadence.
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Media and entertainment evaluation patterns — primitive ratio, span rules, GEPA labeling, cadence.
Recommended primitive ratio for media AI: 45/30/25 — deterministic rules, code assertions, judges. Media has more open-text creative output than other regulated industries, so judges weigh more.
Deterministic rules
45%
Catalog freshness, rating/age gates, CSAM routing, quote fidelity, editor-review gates
Code assertions
30%
Per-category precision/recall, fairness, originality, GARM categories
LLM judges
25%
Faithfulness, tone/framing, row-title quality, summarization fidelity
Recommendation — catalog freshness
Rule
Item live in region
Recommendation — rating gate
Rule
Item rating ≤ profile permission
Recommendation — diversity
Code scorer
Set diversity threshold
Recommendation — row-title quality
Judge
Title describes the row
Moderation — CSAM
Rule
100% NCMEC routing
Moderation — category accuracy
Code scorer
Per-policy P/R
Moderation — fairness
Code scorer
Action-rate parity
Moderation — coordination detection
Code scorer
Cluster signals
Ad — GARM accuracy
Code scorer
Per-category precision
Ad — exclusion adjacency
Rule
Advertiser exclusions enforced
News — faithfulness
Judge
Source-grounded summary
News — quote fidelity
Rule
Verbatim quote match
News — editor gate
Rule
Editor sign-off before publish
IP — rights citation
Rule
Above-threshold matches cite holder
IP — counter-notice routing
Rule
Human-review path
Media traces should expose:
catalog.lookup — region-availability and rating
recommend.score — feature inputs and ranker version
moderation.classify — per-category scores; routing decision
ad.match — GARM categories and brand-safety bits
editorial.review — editor identity and approval state
rights.match — rights-holder match and confidence
For each media judge, label ≥ 50 paired examples:
Recommendation row title: Trust-and-safety + product-content team labels good vs. clickbait vs. wrong
Moderation per-category: Policy team labels; multiple reviewers with reconciliation; ≥ 200 examples for sensitive categories
News summarization: Newsroom labels; cover paraphrase, ambiguous source, multi-source synthesis
Brand safety: Sales + ops team labels per GARM; refresh quarterly
Run judge optimization with budget="medium" for routine judges, budget="heavy" for safety-critical (moderation, brand safety). Hold out 20%.
Per-deploy
CI gate runs scenario suite (rules + assertions)
Continuous
Catalog-freshness checks against live SKU/title feed
Hourly
Moderation drift on a sliding sample
Daily
Sample production traces; full scoring including judges
Weekly
Fairness audit; appeal-overturn rate; advertiser brand-safety report
Monthly
GEPA re-optimization on judge drift
Quarterly
DSA / OSA reporting prep; rights-detection false-positive audit
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Was this helpful?