For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Government and public sector evaluation patterns

Government evaluation patterns — primitive ratio, span rules, GEPA labeling, cadence aligned to NIST AI RMF and OMB M-24-10.

Recommended primitive ratio for government AI: 60/25/15 — deterministic rules, code assertions, judges. Public-sector AI inherits the strictest documentation and reviewability burden of any vertical because every decision can be challenged in court or audit.

Primitive ratio

Primitive
Share
Why

Deterministic rules

60%

Statutory deadlines, exemption citations, eligibility rule references, FOIA exemptions

Code assertions

25%

Reading-level scorers, PII recall, routing-table validation, criterion coverage

LLM judges

15%

Plain-language quality, court-defensibility of exemption rationale, denial-reason readability

Pattern table

Scenario
Primary primitive
Specific check

Citizen chatbot — policy grounding

Judge

Faithfulness to current agency rule

Citizen chatbot — reading level

Code scorer

Flesch-Kincaid ≤ 8

Citizen chatbot — escalation

Rule

Eligibility/legal questions auto-escalate

Benefits — rule citation

Rule

Citation to CFR/state reg present

Benefits — recommendation gate

Rule

Output marked "recommendation" not "decision"

Benefits — fairness

Code scorer

Group-fairness ratio ≥ 0.8 across protected classes

Benefits — denial-reason quality

Judge

Plain-language readability for citizen

FOIA — exemption citation

Rule

Statutory subsection present per redaction

FOIA — deadline

Rule

20-day clock tracked per request

FOIA — PII recall

Code scorer

≥ 99% on labeled PII set

FOIA — over-redaction

Judge

Court-defensibility

Procurement — criterion coverage

Rule

All solicitation criteria scored

Procurement — fairness

Code scorer

Bias check across business categories

Public-safety — disparate impact

Code scorer

Required on any enforcement-influencing output

Public-safety — advisory gate

Rule

No automated enforcement actions

Span rules

  • policy.lookup — version of the agency rule referenced

  • eligibility.eval — which CFR/regulation sections were applied

  • exemption.cite — FOIA exemption subsection per redaction

  • routing.decide — destination office/form match

  • bias.score — disparate impact tracked per output

NIST AI RMF mapping

The four NIST AI Risk Management Framework functions map to evaluation evidence:

NIST function
Stratix evidence

GOVERN

Tier policy + RBAC + audit trail per evaluation

MAP

AI inventory tied to scenario suite per use case

MEASURE

Evaluation reports + drift dashboards

MANAGE

Alert engine + rule pass-rate threshold gates

OMB M-24-10 alignment

For federal agencies covered by OMB M-24-10 (Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of AI):

  • Rights-impacting and safety-impacting AI must have pre- and post-deployment testing

  • Continuous monitoring with documented thresholds

  • Public AI use case inventories

  • Generative-AI-specific guardrails

Stratix evaluation evidence shape:

  • Pre- and post-deployment scenario suite frozen at deployment time

  • Production traces sampled and scored against same suite

  • Quarterly reports on drift, fairness, accuracy

GEPA labeling

For each government judge, label ≥ 50 paired examples:

  • Citizen-services chatbot: Stratified across program types and languages

  • Benefits eligibility: Mix of approval/denial/needs-more-info, labeled by senior caseworkers

  • FOIA exemption: Labeled by FOIA officers; exemption rulings from FOIAonline / state appeals

  • Procurement: Labeled by contracting officers

  • Public-safety: Labeled by trained civil-rights reviewers, not just enforcement personnel

Run judge optimization with budget="medium". Hold out 20% for non-overlapping validation.

Cadence

Cadence
Activity

Per-PR

CI gate runs scenario suite (rules + assertions)

Daily

Sample production traces; full evaluation including judges

Weekly

Disparate-impact audit; FOIA deadline-compliance report

Monthly

GEPA re-optimization on judge drift

Quarterly

NIST AI RMF MEASURE function report; OMB M-24-10 reporting prep

Annually

Public AI use-case inventory update; full bias re-audit

See also

Last updated

Was this helpful?