Manufacturing and industrial compliance
Manufacturing compliance — ISO 9001, IATF 16949, AS9100, ISO 13485, OSHA PSM, EPA RMP, ITAR/EAR/OFAC, RoHS/REACH/Conflict Minerals.
Manufacturing compliance is a layered stack of quality system standards + process-safety regulation + export control + product/material law. AI systems used in production environments inherit all of them.
Regulatory frame
ISO 9001
Most manufacturers (general QMS)
Documented procedure; corrective action evidence
IATF 16949
Automotive supply chain
Customer-specific QMS evidence
AS9100
Aerospace
Risk management; configuration control
ISO 13485
Medical-device manufacturing
Design controls; CAPA
OSHA Process Safety Management (29 CFR 1910.119)
Highly hazardous chemicals (HHC) above thresholds
PHA, MOC, audit, mechanical-integrity records
EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR 68)
Regulated-substance handling above thresholds
Risk-management plan; audit
ITAR (22 CFR 120-130)
Defense articles
License evidence; deemed-export controls
EAR (15 CFR 730-774)
Dual-use export
License determination; ECCN classification
OFAC sanctions
All transactions
Screening at each transaction
RoHS (EU)
Electronics in EU
Substance-restriction proof
REACH (EU)
Chemicals in EU
Registration; SVHC notification
Conflict Minerals (Dodd-Frank § 1502)
SEC-registered issuers
Country-of-origin; due diligence
Recall regulators
Per industry
NHTSA (auto), FDA (food/device), CPSC (consumer), FAA (aerospace)
NIST AI RMF + sectoral
Voluntary; appears in some customer contracts
GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE evidence
ISO 9001 / IATF 16949 / AS9100 / ISO 13485
For manufacturers maintaining a certified quality management system:
Documented procedure required for any AI system affecting product quality
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) evidence for AI-flagged issues
Internal audit scope must include AI components
Customer-specific requirements in IATF 16949 and AS9100 may require deeper supplier-AI evidence
Stratix evaluation evidence:
Audit-trail per evaluation (model, prompt, scoring, decision)
Evaluation-history retained per QMS records-retention schedule
Drift dashboards as monitoring evidence
OSHA PSM and EPA RMP
For sites handling Highly Hazardous Chemicals above thresholds:
PHA (Process Hazard Analysis) — must consider AI control loops
MOC (Management of Change) — model updates are MOC events
Mechanical Integrity — sensors feeding AI must be tested and maintained
Operating Procedures — AI advisories cannot replace approved procedures
Training — operators must understand AI's role and limits
Compliance Audits — every 3 years minimum; PSM violations carry willful-violation penalties
Stratix evaluation evidence:
Hard rule: AI advisory-only on process-safety-critical decisions
SOP-citation rule on every operator copilot output
MOC log per model update tied to evaluation evidence
ITAR / EAR
For defense articles and dual-use technology:
ITAR: classified by USML; license required for export; deemed-export rules for foreign nationals on US soil
EAR: ECCN classification; license determined by item + destination + end-use + end-user
Penalties: per-incident fines; criminal exposure; debarment
Stratix evaluation evidence:
BYOK custom models for ITAR / EAR-controlled technical data
Tenant boundary documented; foreign-national access controls aligned with site procedures
Audit log of every AI interaction with controlled data
OFAC sanctions
For all transactions:
SDN List, Sectoral Sanctions, country programs — all in scope
Knowledge standard — strict liability for primary violations; "reason to know" applies
50% rule — entities owned 50%+ by sanctioned parties are themselves sanctioned
Stratix evaluation evidence:
Hard sanctions-screening rule on every supplier and counterparty surfaced by AI
Daily refresh of sanctions data feeding the rule
Audit log retained for 5 years (OFAC standard)
RoHS / REACH / Conflict Minerals
For materials and component decisions:
RoHS — restricts six (now ten) substances in electronics in the EU
REACH — registration, evaluation, authorization, restriction of chemicals in the EU
Conflict Minerals (3TG: tin, tantalum, tungsten, gold) — SEC issuer due-diligence reporting
Stratix evaluation evidence:
Spec-match rule on substitution recommendations
Country-of-origin code assertion against verified database
Audit log of supplier-info AI surfaced
Recall regulators
By industry:
NHTSA (automotive) — TREAD Act early-warning reporting
FDA (food, drugs, medical devices) — recall classification I/II/III
CPSC (consumer products) — Section 15(b) reporting
FAA (aerospace) — service bulletins, ADs
AI involved in any quality decision must produce evidence that supports root-cause investigation if a recall ensues.
NIST AI RMF and sectoral overlays
Some customers (particularly DoD prime contractors) require NIST AI RMF or CMMC-aligned AI evidence as a flow-down requirement.
Recommended setup
Pro tier minimum; Enterprise for ITAR/EAR-controlled environments
SSO + RBAC scoped to plant / shift / role
BYOK custom models for ITAR/EAR/HIPAA-grade workloads
Hard rules: sanctions screening, spec match, manual-version match, advisory-only for safety-critical
Per-defect-class P/R tracking; drift vs. golden image set
Audit retention matching the longest applicable QMS, recall, or OFAC requirement (default 7+ years)
MOC integration: model updates logged and reviewed per PSM MOC procedure
Tenant isolation; export-control flag at the project level
See also
Last updated
Was this helpful?