For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Manufacturing and industrial compliance

Manufacturing compliance — ISO 9001, IATF 16949, AS9100, ISO 13485, OSHA PSM, EPA RMP, ITAR/EAR/OFAC, RoHS/REACH/Conflict Minerals.

Manufacturing compliance is a layered stack of quality system standards + process-safety regulation + export control + product/material law. AI systems used in production environments inherit all of them.

Regulatory frame

Regime
Applies when
Evaluation-evidence shape

ISO 9001

Most manufacturers (general QMS)

Documented procedure; corrective action evidence

IATF 16949

Automotive supply chain

Customer-specific QMS evidence

AS9100

Aerospace

Risk management; configuration control

ISO 13485

Medical-device manufacturing

Design controls; CAPA

OSHA Process Safety Management (29 CFR 1910.119)

Highly hazardous chemicals (HHC) above thresholds

PHA, MOC, audit, mechanical-integrity records

EPA Risk Management Program (40 CFR 68)

Regulated-substance handling above thresholds

Risk-management plan; audit

ITAR (22 CFR 120-130)

Defense articles

License evidence; deemed-export controls

EAR (15 CFR 730-774)

Dual-use export

License determination; ECCN classification

OFAC sanctions

All transactions

Screening at each transaction

RoHS (EU)

Electronics in EU

Substance-restriction proof

REACH (EU)

Chemicals in EU

Registration; SVHC notification

Conflict Minerals (Dodd-Frank § 1502)

SEC-registered issuers

Country-of-origin; due diligence

Recall regulators

Per industry

NHTSA (auto), FDA (food/device), CPSC (consumer), FAA (aerospace)

NIST AI RMF + sectoral

Voluntary; appears in some customer contracts

GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE evidence

ISO 9001 / IATF 16949 / AS9100 / ISO 13485

For manufacturers maintaining a certified quality management system:

  • Documented procedure required for any AI system affecting product quality

  • Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) evidence for AI-flagged issues

  • Internal audit scope must include AI components

  • Customer-specific requirements in IATF 16949 and AS9100 may require deeper supplier-AI evidence

Stratix evaluation evidence:

  • Audit-trail per evaluation (model, prompt, scoring, decision)

  • Evaluation-history retained per QMS records-retention schedule

  • Drift dashboards as monitoring evidence

OSHA PSM and EPA RMP

For sites handling Highly Hazardous Chemicals above thresholds:

  • PHA (Process Hazard Analysis) — must consider AI control loops

  • MOC (Management of Change) — model updates are MOC events

  • Mechanical Integrity — sensors feeding AI must be tested and maintained

  • Operating Procedures — AI advisories cannot replace approved procedures

  • Training — operators must understand AI's role and limits

  • Compliance Audits — every 3 years minimum; PSM violations carry willful-violation penalties

Stratix evaluation evidence:

  • Hard rule: AI advisory-only on process-safety-critical decisions

  • SOP-citation rule on every operator copilot output

  • MOC log per model update tied to evaluation evidence

ITAR / EAR

For defense articles and dual-use technology:

  • ITAR: classified by USML; license required for export; deemed-export rules for foreign nationals on US soil

  • EAR: ECCN classification; license determined by item + destination + end-use + end-user

  • Penalties: per-incident fines; criminal exposure; debarment

Stratix evaluation evidence:

  • BYOK custom models for ITAR / EAR-controlled technical data

  • Tenant boundary documented; foreign-national access controls aligned with site procedures

  • Audit log of every AI interaction with controlled data

OFAC sanctions

For all transactions:

  • SDN List, Sectoral Sanctions, country programs — all in scope

  • Knowledge standard — strict liability for primary violations; "reason to know" applies

  • 50% rule — entities owned 50%+ by sanctioned parties are themselves sanctioned

Stratix evaluation evidence:

  • Hard sanctions-screening rule on every supplier and counterparty surfaced by AI

  • Daily refresh of sanctions data feeding the rule

  • Audit log retained for 5 years (OFAC standard)

RoHS / REACH / Conflict Minerals

For materials and component decisions:

  • RoHS — restricts six (now ten) substances in electronics in the EU

  • REACH — registration, evaluation, authorization, restriction of chemicals in the EU

  • Conflict Minerals (3TG: tin, tantalum, tungsten, gold) — SEC issuer due-diligence reporting

Stratix evaluation evidence:

  • Spec-match rule on substitution recommendations

  • Country-of-origin code assertion against verified database

  • Audit log of supplier-info AI surfaced

Recall regulators

By industry:

  • NHTSA (automotive) — TREAD Act early-warning reporting

  • FDA (food, drugs, medical devices) — recall classification I/II/III

  • CPSC (consumer products) — Section 15(b) reporting

  • FAA (aerospace) — service bulletins, ADs

AI involved in any quality decision must produce evidence that supports root-cause investigation if a recall ensues.

NIST AI RMF and sectoral overlays

Some customers (particularly DoD prime contractors) require NIST AI RMF or CMMC-aligned AI evidence as a flow-down requirement.

  1. Pro tier minimum; Enterprise for ITAR/EAR-controlled environments

  2. SSO + RBAC scoped to plant / shift / role

  3. BYOK custom models for ITAR/EAR/HIPAA-grade workloads

  4. Hard rules: sanctions screening, spec match, manual-version match, advisory-only for safety-critical

  5. Per-defect-class P/R tracking; drift vs. golden image set

  6. Audit retention matching the longest applicable QMS, recall, or OFAC requirement (default 7+ years)

  7. MOC integration: model updates logged and reviewed per PSM MOC procedure

  8. Tenant isolation; export-control flag at the project level

See also

Last updated

Was this helpful?