> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.layerlens.ai/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.layerlens.ai/4.1-general-use-cases/model-evaluation.md).

# Model evaluation

Pick the right model for a task by running it against the right benchmark.

Picking a model is the most expensive decision you'll make as an AI team. The wrong choice locks in months of wasted iteration on a foundation that was never going to work. Stratix's model-evaluation use case is the disciplined version of that decision.

## The shape of the work

1. **Frame the question.** What does your feature actually need? Reasoning, structured output, multi-turn dialog, code, multilingual, multimodal? Don't pick a model on vibes.
2. **Find the right benchmarks.** Browse the [benchmarks catalog](/5.-select-pick-the-model/benchmarks-catalog.md). Pick 1-3 that map to your task. (Most teams pick too many; resist.)
3. **Browse the public leaderboard.** [Compare models](/5.-select-pick-the-model/compare-models.md) head-to-head. Get to a shortlist of 3-5.
4. **Run a private evaluation on your data.** Public scores tell you what's strong in general. Your data tells you what's strong for *you*. Stratix Premium runs a private evaluation against your dataset.
5. **Read the verdict, not the headline.** A model that scores 2% higher overall but 15% lower on your one critical dimension is the wrong pick.

## Why it works on Stratix

* **Public catalog gives you the shortlist for free.** No multi-week vendor proof-of-concepts to find candidate models.
* **Private evaluations on your data give you the verdict.** Public leaderboards don't see your prompts or your distribution.
* **Compare models is built in.** Side-by-side score tables with confidence intervals.
* **Costs are visible up-front.** ECU consumption is shown before you run.

## Tools you'll use

* [Stratix Public — Models catalog](/5.-select-pick-the-model/models-catalog.md)
* [Stratix Public — Compare models](/5.-select-pick-the-model/compare-models.md)
* [Stratix Premium — Evaluations](/8.-evaluate-score-the-outputs/evaluations.md)
* [Stratix Premium — Benchmarks](https://github.com/LayerLens/gitbook-full/blob/main/13-reference/cli/benchmarks.md)
* [SDK: `client.evaluations.create()`](/4.1-general-use-cases/general.md)

## Outcomes you should see

You'll know this is working when:

* **Model selection time drops from weeks to hours.** Public catalog narrows; private eval decides.
* **Every model decision has a citable evaluation ID.** No "we picked X because it felt better."
* **Re-evaluating a new candidate model takes under 1 hour.** Including standing up the eval against your dataset.
* **Cost and latency are part of the choice, not afterthoughts.** You can tell the team "we picked the cheaper model because at 95% of the quality it's 3× cheaper."

## Anti-patterns

* **Benchmark cargo-culting.** "Everyone uses MMLU" is not why MMLU is right for your task.
* **One-shot picking.** The model frontier moves quarterly. Re-evaluate the candidates as new models drop.
* **Ignoring cost and latency.** A 2% accuracy gain at 4× cost is rarely worth shipping.

## Where to next

* [Concept: Models and benchmarks](/5.-select-pick-the-model/models-and-benchmarks.md)
* [Tutorial: First evaluation in 10 minutes](/8.-evaluate-score-the-outputs/01-first-evaluation.md)
* [Workflow: Compare](/9.-improve-tune-the-system/workflow.md)
* [Cookbook: model-selection recipes](/2.-get-started/all-cookbook-recipes.md)
